دانلود مقاله با موضوع در دفاع از ردیابی تماس دیجیتال
در قالب pdf و در 35 اسلاید،قابل ویرایش، شامل:
موضوع به انگلیسی:In defence of digital contacttracing
بخشی از متن:Abstract
Purpose – The media has even been very critical of some East Asian countries’ use of digital contacttracing
to control Covid-19. For example, South Korea has been criticised for its use of privacy-infringing
digital contact-tracing. However, whether their type of digital contact-tracing was unnecessarily harmful to
the human rights of Korean citizens is open for debate. The purpose of this paper is to examine this criticism
to see if Korea’s digital contact-tracing is ethically justifiable.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper will evaluate Korea’s digital contact-tracing through the
lens of the four human rights principles to determine if their response is ethically justifiable. These four
principles were originally outlined in the European Court of Human Rights, namely, necessary, proportional,
scientifically valid and time-bounded (European Court of Human Rights 1950).
Findings – The paper will propose that while the use of Korea’s digital contact-tracing was scientifically
valid and proportionate (albeit, in need for improvements), it meets the necessity requirement, but is too vague
to meet the time-boundedness requirement.
Originality/value – The Covid-19 pandemic has proven to be one of the worst threats to human health and
the global economy in the past century. There have been many different strategies to tackle the pandemic,
from somewhat laissez-faire approaches, herd immunity, to strict draconian measures. Analysis of the
approaches taken in the response to the pandemic is of high scientific value and this paper is one of the first to
critically engage with one of these methods – digital contact-tracing in South Korea.
Keywords South Korea, Covid-19, Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, European court of human rights,
Pandemic surveillance, Technology ethics
Paper type Research paper
