دانلود مقاله با موضوع مشاور جنسیت و مشاوره توجیه در مشاوره گرفتن
در قالب pdf و در 18 اسلاید،قابل ویرایش، شامل:
موضوع به انگلیسی:Advisor gender and advice
justification in advice taking
بخشی از متن:Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify under what circumstances advisor gender and advice
justification influence advice taking by managers.
Design/methodology/approach – The authors designed a quasirational managerial decision
experiment with both analytic and intuitive cues. The design was a 2 2 between-subjects factorial, in which
gender (male/female) and advice justification (intuitive/analytic) were crossed. The experiment involved two
independent samples, taken from Amazon Mechanical Turk workers and Brazilian professionals.
Findings – Results suggest that, in general, analytic justification is more valued than intuitive justification.
The findings also infer that depending on the advisees’ sample and providing that advice justification is
analytic, quasirational scenarios seem to favor male advisors (MTurk sample) or both male and female
advisors with “male values” (professional sample), as analysis is traditionally considered a “male value.”
Practical implications – Analytic justification will likely lead to more advice utilization in quasirational
managerial situations, as it may act as a safeguard for the accuracy of the offered advice.
Social implications – The results might signal an ongoing, but slow, process leading to the mitigation of
gender stereotypes, considering that the male gender stereotype was active in the MTurk sample, but not in
the professional one
