دانلود مقاله با موضوع صدا یا سکوت: پیشینیان نیات افشاگری
در قالب pdf و در 16 اسلاید،قابل ویرایش، شامل:
موضوع به انگلیسی:Voice or silence: antecedents of
whistleblowing intentions
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to examine the effects of peer ethical behavior and individual differences in
valuation of fairness vs loyalty on whistleblowing intentions in academic settings. This study also tests the
underlying mechanism responsible for the effects of peer behavior on reporting intentions, namely, fear of
reprisal.
Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted with 947 undergraduate students. The
model was tested using ordinary least squares regression models followed by bootstrapped mediation
analyses.
Findings – Results showed that the effects of peer ethical behavior on whistleblowing intentions are
mediated by fear of retaliation. Moreover, the findings indicated that, for low-severity transgressions, there is
an interactive effect between fear of retaliation and endorsement of fairness over loyalty on whistleblowing
intentions.
Research limitations/implications – When the misconduct is seen as minor, a potential whistleblower
may understand that the expected costs outweigh the possible benefits of blowing the whistle. In such
situations, higher fear of retaliation would undermine the effects of individual’s endorsement of fairness over
loyalty on reporting intentions.
Practical implications – As the social environment significantly affects someone’s whistleblowing
intentions, there should be visible efforts to improve and to foster an ethical infrastructure in organizations.
Social implications – As fear of retaliation by peers is one of the most important determinants affecting
the decision to report misconduct in general, there must be serious efforts from leaders to mitigate any threat
of retaliation to those who come forward.
